Aligning Automation Testing With Manual Testing
When things are transforming so quickly in the world of software development, it is very likely for DevOps to foster Automation with everything they do. Though QA and software development teams have all the stress to feed innovation and quality, the proper knowledge to integrate manual testing into Automation is vital to create solutions that are not average.
Nevertheless, there is no denial of the fact that new businesses that are swinging into test automation services are deeply intrigued by automated practices. But your QA testing service provider needs to understand that using Automation for all of their testing needs is not witchcraft. Even if things look breezy with Automation, it is the right balance between manual testing and Automation that can help unlock the ultimate realm of software testing services.
you have different teams working on automated and manual testing or you have only one individual responsible for performing both, finding the distinction between automation testing services and manual testing can bring significant value and benefits.
Ways to Align Automation and Manual Testing
Without keeping things concealed anymore, let us quickly jump on the idea of aligning automation testing with manual testing for striking the perfect balance and benefits of two.
Know Your Regression Suite
Automation is all about streamlining tasks that are repetitive and time-consuming. Therefore, the first task that you need to take is to identify all the tests that you need to run very often. Also, working on the regression suite will give you a complete idea of the tests you need to follow after every integration or code update is done.
Since the entire idea behind testing is to ensure the evolution of an application, make sure you understand the consistent benefits of planning a regression suite for every addition you do with the application. Moreover, the knowledge to learn about devices and operating systems can be even more beneficial when paired with a regression suite as it can help you have a better command of the testing conditions.
Encourage Interactions With Developers
When you are working with developers, it is very likely to have no say on what needs to be automated and what should not. However, you can definitely interact with developers to have their inputs into the quality assurance and testing services by understanding the condition of the application.
Read: 101 Guide On Java POS 2021
it may demand transparency with any updates made to the software, keeping open contact with the development team could improve the implementation. Especially when the developers are heading for UI revision or adding some new functionality to the existing software, having interactions with developers could help plan components that need Automation and manual testing.
when you partner with developers right from the time integrations and codes are planned, it helps you understand the entire framework better and have an in-depth understanding of the areas that need to be checked for optimum performance.
Never Hesitate From Small Test Cases
When it comes to quality software development, every little thing counts. And the same is true for Automation, as small test cases enable you to enjoy sustainable and reusable samples. In other words, the smaller the test cases are, the fewer will be the chances for UI improvement, giving way for more accurate development.
Read: Achieve Full CECL Compliance Today
the other hand, the full use journeys and complex test cases must be kept for manual testing as this can help cut the time for scripting while allowing greater bandwidth and flexibility with app development. Also, it does not need you to look back into scripts for any UI changes you encounter during the testing process.
Have A Visual Check
When planning to balance Automation and manual testing, make sure you always spend time on practical monitoring with Automation. There can be situations where an app runs well through a test but shows some visual glitches or incompatibility issues with different browsers. Such errors could disturb the overall experience of your users and may decrease the quality of interaction that you have worked for.
Read: Guide to Understanding Personal Data
excellent way to overcome this struggle is by aligning automated screenshots into an automated testing process. The same can even be worked while working on selenium for practical testing. Practicing such tactics could allow you to overcome visual compatibility issues that otherwise could be missed with your standard functional testing procedure.
Risk Assessment
primary factor that decides the use of Automation for testing an application should be risk involvement. Though you may be well aware of the test cases that are more likely to catch some risks, it is equally important to look for every test case even if they involve least or zero risks in the past. These practices come out very handy when working on manual testing.
Read: User Experience Trends in Web Application Design
Usually, when risk assessment is done for a segment of test cases, it is divided into high, medium, and low levels of risks. Once you are done configuring the risk analysis, you can simply put the high-risk use cases for Automation. However, you can run through all the medium and low-risk use cases manually to ensure the desired output with your end results.
Always Remember, Automation Is Flawed
you are familiar with QA and Testing Services, then you may already know the fact that everything cannot be automated. Even when you have complete knowledge of Selenium commands and rich automation experience, there are still certain things that are better done manually.
instance, if you need to run a usability test for an application, the system bound to predefined commands cannot understand the difference between “good” and “bad” usability. And there are various other conditions or situations that need manual checking to make an application meet its purpose.
Read: Mistakes You Make While Hiring Developers & How To Avoid Them
usability checks are not the only case where you cannot rely on automation testing, getting over the hassle of intense scripting needs you to stick with manual testing.
The Crux
in all, making a decision between Automation and manual testing entirely depends on the time, cost, and quality factors associated with the application. However, when you own a QA testing services company, serving the best defines your commitment towards the customers.
Therefore, it is necessary for you to evaluate the code for the likely findings that you may get through Automation. If you believe that working on an automated process could make you skip the compatibility issues, visual issues, or any form of risks, in that case, the things must be better handled through manual testing. This will not only help you save resources but ensure deliveries that are meant to meet their objectives.
